ATI TEAS 7 Reading Practice Test

Correct Answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B because if whole language is less effective than phonics at teaching reading (as stated in the question), then it logically follows that phonics is more effective than whole language. This conclusion is directly supported by the given statement. Choice A is incorrect because the statement implies the opposite. Choice C is not a logical conclusion based on the information provided. Choice D is also incorrect as the statement does not discuss changes in the definition of literacy.

Correct Answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C because the email is offering students a chance to improve their scores and avoid failing the course, demonstrating the instructor's intention to support student success. The email does not criticize students (A), but rather provides a positive opportunity for growth. While motivation (B) and acknowledging difficulty (D) may be components of the email, the primary purpose is to offer a chance for improvement to prevent failure. This choice aligns most closely with the overall tone and content of the email.

Correct Answer: D

Rationale: The correct answer is D because it directly assesses the argument's validity by examining the correlation between studying a foreign language in high school and college acceptance rates. This information is crucial in evaluating the argument's claims about the benefits of learning a foreign language in high school. Choice A is incorrect as high school students' preferences may not necessarily reflect the effectiveness or benefits of studying a foreign language. Choice B is also incorrect as it focuses on job placement rates rather than college acceptance rates, which is not directly relevant to the argument's claims. Choice C is not as useful as choice D since parents' preferences may not align with the actual outcomes or benefits of studying a foreign language in high school. In summary, choice D is the most relevant source of information to evaluate the argument's validity, while the other choices are less directly related to the argument's claims.

Correct Answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B because if whole language is less effective than phonics at teaching reading (as stated in the question), then it logically follows that phonics is more effective than whole language. This conclusion is directly supported by the given statement. Choice A is incorrect because the statement implies the opposite. Choice C is not a logical conclusion based on the information provided. Choice D is also incorrect as the statement does not discuss changes in the definition of literacy.

Correct Answer: D

Rationale: The correct answer is D: Incredulous. The word "incredulous" means skeptical or disbelieving. In this context, the author's attitude towards a person unable to find employment would likely be one of disbelief or skepticism. This suggests that the author may find it difficult to accept or believe that someone is unable to secure a job. A: Descriptive - This choice would imply that the author simply describes the situation without any judgment or emotion, which may not capture the author's likely attitude. B: Conciliatory - This choice would imply that the author is trying to make peace or reconcile with the person unable to find employment, which may not align with the likely attitude of disbelief or skepticism. C: Ingenuous - This choice means innocent or naive, which would not accurately describe the author's likely attitude of disbelief or skepticism.