ATI TEAS Reading

Correct Answer: D

Rationale: The correct answer is D: Simile. A simile is a figure of speech that compares two unlike things using "like" or "as." In the poem, the spider is compared to a weaver, emphasizing its skill and precision in creating its web. This comparison enhances the reader's understanding of the spider's characteristics. Choice A (Idiom) is incorrect because an idiom is a phrase that has a different meaning from the literal interpretation. Choice B (Haiku) is incorrect as a haiku is a form of Japanese poetry with specific syllable patterns. Choice C (ABBA rhyming convention) is incorrect as it refers to a specific rhyme scheme in poetry, which is not relevant to the use of the spider in the poem.

Correct Answer: D

Rationale: The correct answer is D because an actuary is a professional who specializes in assessing and managing risks in the insurance industry, including calculating premiums. This role requires advanced mathematical and statistical skills to analyze data and predict future events accurately. A, B, and C are incorrect because they do not accurately describe the role of an actuary. A doctor works in the medical field, a hospitalist is a physician who cares for hospitalized patients, and an insurance agent sells insurance policies but does not necessarily assess risks like an actuary does.

Correct Answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B because it exemplifies both alliteration and personification. Alliteration is present with the repetition of "shuddered," "swayed," "shook," and "screamed." Personification is demonstrated by attributing human-like qualities to the object "it" that is described as being able to shudder, sway, shake, and scream. The other choices do not exhibit both literary devices as clearly as option B. Choice A primarily focuses on simile and does not include personification. Choice C uses metaphor rather than personification. Choice D includes personification with the mention of a "siren call," but it lacks the alliterative elements present in option B.

Correct Answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C because in this situation, the man is being attacked in an alley by another man with a knife, which constitutes a clear and imminent threat to his life. In self-defense cases, the use of lethal force is often considered justifiable when faced with a deadly threat. The other choices involve non-life-threatening situations such as verbal altercation (A), theft (B), and physical altercation (D), where the use of lethal force would not be legally justified as the threat level is not considered deadly.

Correct Answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A because it logically completes the passage by implying that a war between world powers was extremely likely, providing a plausible explanation for the context given. This choice fits the overall tone and context of the passage. Option B is incorrect as it presents an extreme and absolute statement that does not align with the uncertainty expressed in the passage. Option C is incorrect as it specifies only a few countries and does not address the broader context of the passage that suggests involvement of multiple world powers. Option D is incorrect as it focuses solely on Austria, neglecting the involvement of other world powers as suggested in the passage.