TEAS Test Reading Questions

Correct Answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C because the author's purpose is to explain the influence of idealism on American social and political discourse. This is evident from the content of the text, which focuses on discussing how idealistic beliefs shape the social and political landscape in America. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because they do not align with the main theme of the text. Choice A is incorrect because advocating for specific ideals and beliefs is not the primary focus of the text. Choice B is incorrect because the role of skin coloration and markings in snakes is not discussed in the text. Choice D is incorrect because the impact of snake behavior on the ecosystem is not relevant to the author's purpose in the text.

Correct Answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C because the author's purpose is to explain the influence of idealism on American social and political discourse. This is evident from the content of the text, which focuses on discussing how idealistic beliefs shape the social and political landscape in America. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because they do not align with the main theme of the text. Choice A is incorrect because advocating for specific ideals and beliefs is not the primary focus of the text. Choice B is incorrect because the role of skin coloration and markings in snakes is not discussed in the text. Choice D is incorrect because the impact of snake behavior on the ecosystem is not relevant to the author's purpose in the text.

Correct Answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B because the passage clearly states that Julia set a course for home, indicating her intention to go home. Choice A is incorrect as there is no indication that Julia cannot go directly home. Choice C is incorrect as there is no mention of Julia returning to work. Choice D is incorrect as there is no mention of Julia being worried about the fire spreading to her home. Hence, the most accurate interpretation is that Julia is planning to go home.

Correct Answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A because an essay by a historian analyzing the lasting effects of World War I is a secondary source that provides interpretation and analysis of historical events. It offers a scholarly perspective based on research and provides context for understanding the war's impact. Explanation: 1. A historian's essay is a secondary source that interprets primary sources and adds scholarly analysis. 2. It offers a broader view of the war's effects beyond individual experiences or specific events. 3. It contributes to the understanding of historical significance and implications of World War I. 4. It helps viewers gain insight into the broader historical context and consequences of the war. Summary: B, C, and D are not examples of secondary sources for a documentary about World War I because photographs of military equipment (B) are primary sources, a recorded interview with a veteran (C) is a firsthand account (primary source), and letters written by soldiers (D) are also primary sources that reflect personal experiences.

Correct Answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B because the passage mentions that the coral snake and kingsnake share the same predators, indicating a similarity between the two species. This conclusion is directly supported by information in the passage. Incorrect Answer Analysis: A: The passage does not mention anything about the kingsnake being dangerous to humans, so this conclusion cannot be drawn. C: The passage does not state that it is safe to handle snakes or that you can easily differentiate between poisonous and non-poisonous snakes, so this conclusion is not supported. D: There is no mention in the passage of the kingsnake changing its markings in response to hawks or eagles, so this conclusion cannot be inferred.