Reading TEAS Practice Test

Correct Answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B because the author's main conclusion is that Leif Erikson deserves more credit for exploring America. This can be inferred from the context of the passage where the author discusses Leif Erikson's accomplishments and the lack of recognition he receives compared to Columbus. Choice A is incorrect as it simply states a fact about Leif Erikson. Choice C is incorrect as it mentions a potential motivation for Leif's expeditions but not the main conclusion of the passage. Choice D is incorrect as it provides a historical fact related to Leif Erikson but does not capture the main point of the passage, which is about recognizing his exploration efforts.

Correct Answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A because the author discusses the advantages of devices like the iPad or Kindle over books due to their multiple uses. The secondary argument supports the main point about the superiority of these devices. Choice B is incorrect as it only mentions the importance of books in specific situations, not a secondary argument. Choice C is incorrect as it talks about printed encyclopedias, not digital devices. Choice D is incorrect as it makes a broad, unsupported claim about technology eliminating the need for stories, which is not discussed in the passage.

Correct Answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C because the second paragraph discusses how confirming and disconfirming evidence impact hypotheses differently. It explains that a single piece of evidence can either support or refute a hypothesis, depending on the context. This aligns with the main idea of the paragraph, which is about the varying effects of evidence on hypotheses. A is incorrect because the paragraph does not focus on the idea of one monkey proving a hypothesis about all monkeys. B is incorrect as it simplifies the complexity of evidence's impact on hypotheses. D is incorrect as the paragraph does not explicitly discuss the failings of the scientific method but rather focuses on the nuanced relationship between evidence and hypotheses.

Correct Answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B: Third person limited. In third person limited point of view, the narrator only has access to the thoughts and feelings of one character. This allows the author to provide a deep insight into that character's perspective while maintaining some level of objectivity. This choice is correct because it indicates a specific focus on one character's viewpoint. Explanation of other choices: A: First person - This choice would indicate that the story is being told from the perspective of a character within the story, which is not necessarily the case. C: Third person omniscient - In this point of view, the narrator has access to the thoughts and feelings of all characters. This would give a broader perspective than what is indicated in the question. D: Objective - In an objective point of view, the narrator simply presents the events without delving into any character's thoughts or feelings. This choice is not as specific as third person limited in terms of focusing on a single character's perspective.

Correct Answer: B

Rationale: The correct answer is B because statistical data supports the claim that people generally prefer clowns to magicians for children's birthday parties despite coulrophobia. This preference leads to Bobo booking more shows and making more money than Gob. Choice A is not enough to explain Bobo's success as it does not address the audience's preferences. Choice C, while relevant, does not directly address the audience's preference for clowns. Choice D is irrelevant as the location does not explain the difference in success between Bobo and Gob.