ATI TEAS English Practice Test

Correct Answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A: Peer-reviewed articles. Peer-reviewed articles undergo rigorous evaluation by experts in the field before publication, ensuring high quality and reliability. This process helps to maintain accuracy and credibility of the research presented. In contrast, Wikipedia (B) can be edited by anyone and may contain inaccuracies. Opinion articles from a newspaper (C) are subjective and lack the thorough research and review process of peer-reviewed articles. Blogs and social media (D) often lack the academic rigor and verification processes necessary for scholarly research. Therefore, peer-reviewed articles are the most reliable source for scholarly research due to their rigorous evaluation and credibility.

Correct Answer: C

Rationale: The correct answer is C. This sentence is punctuated correctly because it uses commas to set off the nonessential elements "San Francisco, California" and "from June 2011". The main sentence "One of my favorite places to visit is San Francisco" stands alone without these additional details. Choice A: Incorrect - There should not be a comma before "California" as it is an essential part of the location. Choice B: Incorrect - The same error as in Choice A, with an unnecessary comma before "California". Choice D: Incorrect - The comma after "June" is unnecessary and disrupts the flow of the sentence.

Correct Answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A because it consists of two independent clauses (The sky is clear, and the stars are bright) connected by a coordinating conjunction 'and.' This structure makes it a compound sentence. Choice B is incorrect as it is a complex sentence with a dependent clause (Although it was late) and an independent clause (he stayed up). Choice C is incorrect as it is a simple sentence with only one independent clause (She reads books). Choice D is incorrect as it is a complex sentence with a dependent clause (While she reads) and an independent clause (she listens to music).

Correct Answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A: Peer-reviewed articles. Peer-reviewed articles undergo rigorous evaluation by experts in the field before publication, ensuring high quality and reliability. This process helps to maintain accuracy and credibility of the research presented. In contrast, Wikipedia (B) can be edited by anyone and may contain inaccuracies. Opinion articles from a newspaper (C) are subjective and lack the thorough research and review process of peer-reviewed articles. Blogs and social media (D) often lack the academic rigor and verification processes necessary for scholarly research. Therefore, peer-reviewed articles are the most reliable source for scholarly research due to their rigorous evaluation and credibility.

Correct Answer: A

Rationale: The correct answer is A because a specific thesis statement clearly outlines the main argument or focus of the writing. It helps guide the reader and keeps the writer focused. Choice B is incorrect because the written work should support, not disprove, the thesis. Choice C is incorrect because the thesis statement is typically found at the beginning of a paper to provide a roadmap for the reader. Choice D is incorrect because supporting evidence is essential to strengthen and validate the thesis statement, regardless of whether it is an opinion.